Offer Acceptance And Agreement

by admin on September 29th, 2021

The offer and acceptance constitute the contract and the intention to establish legal relations and determine whether it is a binding contract before the courts. In the absence of one of these elements, it cannot be a valid contract. As a general rule, a tender can only be accepted by the tenderer or an authorised representative. However, if the offer is included in an option agreement, it may be assigned or transferred without the supplier`s consent, unless the option involves a purchase on credit or expressly prohibits the assignment. If indefinite means of material representation, such as “quantities you can order” or “if necessary”, do not lead to a binding contract, the non-indication of this offer does not result in a binding contract on that date. o Stevenson, Jaques & Co v Mclean= a simple request for information is treated differently from a counter-offer. in that case, it was only a simple question that should have been answered and not treated as a rejection of the offer. Statute of Frauds The Fraud Act was passed by the English Parliament in 1677 and became law in various forms, both in England and the United States. It requires that certain types of contracts be in writing. The main feature of different state laws that follow the initial status is the provision that no legal action or legal action can be maintained, unless there is a note or memorandum on its subject matter, the conditions and the identity of the parties that have been signed by the party who, under it, must be charged or obliged: or a plenipotentiary representative. The purpose of the law is to prevent proof of a non-existent agreement by fraud or perjury in the event of recourse for breach of an alleged contract. o In principle, revocation may take place at any time before the acceptance of a tender and must be notified to the tenderer. According to negotiation studies, negotiation is characterized by two distinct elements: the material component directly related to the content of treaties and the dynamic component, which is related only to the conduct of negotiations.

In order to outline the content of the grantor, negotiation studies point out that negotiations are always linked to a product, service or a concrete change in the current situation desired by the parties.61xDupont (1990), supra No. 9, at 215. The parameters of this service, the product or the modification of a concrete situation are the final result of these negotiations. These parameters constitute the essential element of the negotiations (also called technical, objective or economic component).62x Id. This component therefore includes all issues relating to the final outcome of the negotiations, including issues relating to price, quality, timing of a service or milestones of a project, terms of payment, warranties and other conditions of the product or service. These characteristics of the future product or service are the themes that usually represent the content of the future contract. Together with the material element, the negotiations include the second element of the negotiations, the constituent d y n a m i c (also referred to as “relational”). It covers the processes separate from the core and content of the future treaty. Dynamic elements include, for example, the planning, timing and structuring of negotiations, as well as the division of labour where necessary during negotiations. These problems are not the same as those included in the final treaty. However, the issues that make up the dynamic element are relevant to the management of the trading process in a transaction. The negotiation studies thus describe the content and relevance of these issues in the management of the negotiations.

. . .

From → Uncategorized

Comments are closed.